Skip to content
Bugwise
Menu

Explain equivalence partitioning and boundary value analysis using an age field that accepts 18 to 60.

Test designJunior

In shortEquivalence partitioning splits inputs into groups that behave the same and tests one value per group; boundary value analysis tests the edges of those groups, such as 17, 18, 60 and 61.

Model answer

Both are black-box techniques that help you test smart, not everything.

Equivalence partitioning (EP) divides inputs into groups (partitions) where the software should behave the same way. You test one value from each partition.

For an age field that accepts 18 to 60:

PartitionExample valueExpected
Below 18 (invalid)10Error
18 to 60 (valid)35Accepted
Above 60 (invalid)75Error
Not a whole number (invalid)“abc”, empty, 25.5Error

Boundary value analysis (BVA) focuses on the edges of partitions, because developers often make off-by-one mistakes, such as writing age > 18 instead of age >= 18.

Boundary values to test: 17, 18, 60, 61 (two-value BVA). Many testers also add 19 and 59 (three-value BVA).

ValueExpected
17Rejected
18Accepted
60Accepted
61Rejected

Together, the techniques give strong coverage with about 8-10 tests instead of hundreds. On a mobile app, also check that the numeric keyboard appears and that pasted values like ” 18 ” with spaces are handled.

Learn more: Boundary Value Analysis

What they're looking for

Correct partitions (below 18, 18-60, above 60, plus invalid types), correct boundary values, and why the techniques reduce the number of tests while catching off-by-one bugs.

Common mistakes

  • Choosing wrong boundary values, like 19 and 59 only.
  • Forgetting invalid partitions such as empty input, letters or decimals.
  • Testing every number from 1 to 100 instead of using the techniques.

More test design questions

Esc

Type to search the whole site.